The Tree of Life: A Meditation on Grace

In the opening moments of Terrence Malick’s 2011 film The Tree of Life, Mrs. O’Brien (played by the beautiful Jessica Chastain) meditates on the meaning of life. “The nuns taught us there were two ways through life,” she recalls. “The way of nature, and the way of grace. You have to choose which one you’ll follow. Grace doesn’t try to please itself. Accepts being slighted, forgotten, disliked. Accepts insults and injuries. Nature only wants to please itself. Get others to please it too. Likes to lord it over them. To have its own way. It finds reasons to be unhappy when all the world is shining around it. And love is smiling through all things. The nuns taught us that no one who loves the way of grace ever comes to a bad end. I will be true to you. Whatever comes.”

Sequences flow by with all the abandon of a dream. A guitar stands, pale and chilly in a dewy morning light. Brothers stand, wiping condensation from their faces as a palette of tall grasses sway about them. Somewhere in the cavern of sound, beyond sight, a mother is shrieking, shrieking, shrieking as a father kneels, head bowed, unable to stand. A child is dead. No son or daughter ever grows beyond childhood in the eyes of their mother, their father. Not in the case of death. In that moment, they are an infant, their feet small, the sunlight playing on the creases of their feet.

“That poor boy,” Mr. O’Brien says. He considers how he treated his son, recalling with painful accuracy true moments of small cruelty. He recalls how he would criticize his son for how he turned pages of music. He stares somewhere we cannot see. The tears glisten but cannot flow. They, too, are benumbed beyond movement, glassing his eyes. “That poor boy.”

Though elliptical, frustrating, and seemingly enigmatic beyond understanding, The Tree of Life may easily be boiled down to this monologue. Like a tapestry of thought, the film moves through memory, space and time with nary a pause. Yet with Mrs. O’Brien’s meditations in hand, we may at last be privvy to the message the film offers us. It’s a message many will walk away from. Make no mistake. The Tree of Life is a starkly religious film.

“Brother,” an adult Jack, played by Sean Penn, muses. “Mother. It was they who led me to your door.” To whose door? The answer is too apparent, too seemingly simple, to be digested or accepted upon a first viewing. Like The Thin Red Line, The Tree of Life is a film that adheres to a strict sense of prerequisites. It demands that we treat it as a meditation, rather than a film. It is unbound by the standard rules of cinema. It sheds them without hesitation. It leaves us to follow or abandon at will.

Much has been made of the twenty minute Creation sequence to be found early on in the film. Featuring vast plumes of cosmic dust, strangely coherent dinosaurs and a ballet of cells, we see something we did not expect. Startling, strangely out of place, and at first inexplicable, reflection shows us that the Creation sequence is the closest thing Mrs. O’Brien may ever have for an answer to her question. “God,” she pleads. “Why? Where were you?”

It’s no accident that the film opens with a quote from the Book of Job 38:4, 7 – “Where were you when I laid the foundations of the Earth, when the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?”

More than any other film, The Tree of Life opens a doorway to another person’s life. Rather than come to understand Jack through regular narrative, we share his memories and find them rather similar to our own. Jack’s secret moments are our secret moments. His fears are our fears, his love, our love. This is a relationship of trust that most films could only fantasize about.

Our childhood is particularly resonant. Our attention is held by important things – light cast from a mirror or glass, quivering on the wall like a mercury stain. A leaf somersaults along the sidewalk in an invisible current of wind. The world is a place of light and wind and crickets and a moon swaddled by long, blue clouds.  We remember certain things. Trying to walk with dad. A ball rumbling agreeably along under a table, our first book. The sound of a chair rocking against the old wooden planks of our house. Dad reaches down and pats us on the shoulder, a neighbor shows us how to mime. A curtain billows in the wind, a chair moves of its own accord. The world is a magical, shimmering place.

At one point we fall and hurt our foot. Mother helps us. She takes care of us. She holds us and takes our wound in her hand and makes all our pain go away. Later, a butterfly lands in her outstretched palm. Her hands, recognizable to us, dance delightedly on either side of a mirror. Our mother is so beautiful. So beautiful she could fly.

Other things are not so pleasant. Such as our brother, who, when he comes, steals mother’s attention from us. He is a bumbling, unpredictable, shocking and altogether unwelcome addition to our world. Yet he is undeniably there, and some thing retain their potency. Bubbles, for instance. Things happen beyond the scope of our vision that we don’t fully understand, such as our friend the mime having what appears to be a seizure. Dad plants a tree. He helps us to pour the water. Mother smiles down at us. She’s still beautiful. “You’ll be grown before that tree is tall,” she says.

But growing up is hard. Our adolescence, shown later, is marked by hard changes, and uncomfortable reckonings. Darkness begins to creep into the world as our childhood begins to fade. Our relationship with mother and father grows uncomfortable. New feelings flit below the surface of the world, new epiphanies both unfamiliar to us and frightening. Dad begins to change, demanding things from us we don’t understand. He draws invisible lines in the world with sticks, lines that denote forbidden things. We learn that reflections cast in water are far less reliable than ones cast in a mirror. “That’s where God lives,” mother says to us, pointing at the sky. She kisses us on the head. One by one, she turns out the lights.

The Tree of Life is a film unlike any other. Uncompromising in every sense of the word, staggeringly ambitious, achingly personal and honest, it is perhaps the most ambiguous and  beautiful film I have ever watched. It’s not perfect. The ending leaves a little too much to question, and feels a little too well groomed. The acting is so genuine throughout the vast majority of the film that the few moments which are scripted feel just that – scripted. While this viewer appreciated the Creation sequence, the film would not have lost much had it been removed or at least truncated.

Yet despite these flaws The Tree of Life still stands far above the vast majority of its peers. It, like Malick’s other films, is a demanding film, one that warrants repeat viewings. I feel that I say this about nearly every Malick film, and I’ve concluded that I do, and that’s alright. Terrence Malick is a difficult filmmaker. This is not my favorite of Malick’s films – that honor goes to The Thin Red Line, but it is a close second. I am reminded of a sequence, over a third of the way through The Tree of Life, where a young Jack tries to pray, but doesn’t quite see the point.

As someone who grew up Catholic, I understood and loved this scene perhaps better than any other in the film. Watching The Tree of Life, or any other Malick film, can be like trying to pray as a child. It’s a lot trickier than it seems. Most people give it up. Some don’t. And those of us that don’t swear they saw something more than emptiness beyond that veil of darkness hiding behind our eyes. And that’s precisely what The Tree of Life is. It’s an homage, a tribute and a memorial to that which lies beyond the veil. I hope you give it a chance, and that when you do you are rewarded. I hope you see something magical. I truly, truly do.

The Bottom Line: Like trying to pray as a child, Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life is a frustrating, perhaps rewarding and ultimately beautiful experience.

Overall Score: 9.6/10

Optional: A particularly well put and thought provoking discussion of this film can be found here: YouTube Preview Image

Written By Ries

Ries is a writer, blogger, amateur explorer and full time United States Marine. He graduated from DePauw University in 2011 with a Bachelor’s Degree in English and is busy putting that degree to work writing elite movie reviews for sites like CineKatz. In his spare time he enjoys traveling, movie watching, talking to himself in the mirror and working on novels that may or may not ever be finished. Of all the things he misses about being a civilian, he misses his beard the most.

26 Readers Commented

Join discussion
  1. Shane on March 18, 2013
    Wow. I've been wanting to watch this film. I just never find the time to set aside and completely immerse myself into it. It's on my DVR at home, so I'll check it out. As usual, great review.
    • Ries Author on March 18, 2013
      It is definitely a film you want to dedicate an evening to. Thank you for reading, Shane!
  2. kevin clare on March 18, 2013
    The more and more I recently read about Tree of Life the more and more I feel i need to revisit it to perhaps serve it better justice on my first thoughts on it. With that in mind, it is difficult for me to really agree or disagree with your review, but it is very good indeed, and personal. I first saw this sometime ago and it just didn't do it for me, but your review has reminded to perhaps revisit. I loved all that Malick did until this point , The Thin Red Line is exceptional so of all the directors he gets a second chance from me and I may have a change from my initial view.
    • Ries Author on March 18, 2013
      If you do decide to revisit the Tree of Life, I really hope it speaks to you. I know how it feels to be left out of a Malick movie - actually, most of his movies tend to leave me out upon first viewing - and I will cross my fingers that this time it decides to make itself apparent to you. Thanks for your compliments and thanks for dropping by!
  3. Erlingur Grétar Einarsson on March 18, 2013
    I liked the film, but wasn't blown away by it. I certainly appreciated the visual poetry and the issue of grace vs. nature, and how both elements had their justification, but maybe it had been hyped up too much for me when I saw it.
    • Ries Author on March 18, 2013
      I am of the opinion that you can't hype this film too much, but the more you hype it the more a viewer will go into it with a preconceived notion of what they expect from it. I hope someday you revisit it on your own terms, and walk away from it with all you deserve. :-)
  4. Erik on March 18, 2013
    I think it is one of those films you either hate or love. I hated it. I have to highlight though that it is visually stunning. Good review, I understand why you liked it but it is just not for me. Have you seen his new film, To The Wonder?
    • Ries Author on March 18, 2013
      Hey Erik, I agree that it's quite a polarizing film. I'm sorry you hated it, but I'm pleased you enjoyed my review! I have not yet seen "To The Wonder," but it's imperative that I do. I love Terrence Malick's movies.
  5. Erik on March 18, 2013
    for some reason I managed to put my e-mail address under Website so if you click on it and a warning window comes up don't freak out. lol
    • Ries Author on March 18, 2013
      It's all good. But thanks for the heads up!
  6. Elena on March 18, 2013
    I was excited for The Tree of Life for months but gave up after 15 minutes into it because I was bored out of my mind – even though I was watching this in a bathtub, feeling extra calm and in the mood for something visually pleasing. I guess the 'frustrating' part of watching it stood out for me the most. An interesting review, though. Your writing style is beautiful.
    • Ries Author on March 18, 2013
      Why thank you, Elena, for your kind words. I'm happy you enjoyed the review, though I'm sad that the Tree of Life didn't hold your attention. I confess, I've never heard of watching a film in a bathtub before - is that a tradition with you for film watching? It sounds wonderful. (Though getting up halfway through the film would probably jar me.) Another time, perhaps, maybe it will find you. :-)
  7. ruth on March 18, 2013
    Wonderful review. I agree this film is absolutely beautiful and there's a meditative quality about it. It's one of those films that's bound to be polarizing. I was not enamored with it but appreciate it for what it is, despite my confusion at times watching it.
    • Ries Author on March 18, 2013
      Ruth, I'm so glad you gave it a chance. And thank you as well, so much, for your kindness.
  8. Goodatlife on March 18, 2013
    Each of your reviews leaves me hungry, I scramble to find a way to see the film NOW.....I fail, I lament, I stay hungry too often.
    • Ries Author on March 18, 2013
      I'm flattered! Thank you for reading/coming by/commenting! :-)
  9. Michael on March 18, 2013
    It was a beautiful review ; ) Ries. It's hard to describe the movie and do it any justice. Adjectives slide off the way glitter might on the side of diamond. I think I respect this movie because it shows life, with such incredible clarity that it almost feels raw until you realize no one else was in your childhood to betray your secrets. Malick simple saw and made. It haunts us because it exposes the shadows that we keep, locked in our minds. It runs a finger along the roots that we polished smooth with touching when we were young. I think this movie finds certain people and when it does, they're grateful. I am.
    • Ries Author on March 19, 2013
      Thanks for your support, Michael. It is indeed a haunting, celebratory film. Malick finds all our secret memories and makes a film out of them. The result is a sense of connection, one that any artist would do well to pursue.
  10. Mark Walker on March 19, 2013
    Excellent review here Ries! It has had many critics but I absolutely adore this film. It was one of the true highlights of 2011.
    • Ries Author on March 19, 2013
      Thanks, Mark! I couldn't agree with you more. It's a very controversial film, but for those of us it effected it is something of a masterpiece. Thanks for stopping by!
  11. 70srichard on March 19, 2013
    A nice review of a film I despise. You do the best that you can to make sense of a movie that could never tolerate a second time. I know it is a polarizing experience and I am on the opposite pole from you. Your writing on the other hand makes the experience slightly less painful.
    • Ries Author on March 19, 2013
      ;-) I'm pleased my writing could help soothe you, Rich.
  12. Scott Anderson on March 19, 2013
    Ries it was a pleasure reading your review of The Tree of Life, I like you felt that this film has a lot to offer if you gave it a chance. I thought about this movie long after viewing and continue to think about it. Thanks also for serving our country.
    • Ries Author on March 19, 2013
      Scott, thank you for dropping by. I'm so happy to find a kindred spirit on such ambiguous grounds. I too think about this film often, which is the hallmark of great art. And on a personal note, you are quite welcome. Thank you for being so considerate. :-)
  13. A Casual Film Buff on March 22, 2013
    What a beautiful review! This is the text I would've wanted to write. Such a poetic piece of writing, much like the film! This film has been somewhat of a milestone in my journey into the world of film. I watched for the first time about a week and I haven't recovered yet. It's something I can't really put into words but I absolutely love The Tree of Life. I have never seen anything like it and I'm quite certain I never will.
    • Ries on March 22, 2013
      I'm so flattered! :) And I agree, this film was a true experience and joy to watch. It took me a few days to recover from this film as well, but the experience was completely worth it. I absolutely love it, too. Thank you for commenting!

Have something to say?